worcester
western mass
vermont
urbana-champaign
tennessee
tampa bay
seattle
sarasota
santa cruz, ca
santa barbara
san francisco bay area
san francisco
san diego
saint louis
rogue valley
rochester
richmond
portland
pittsburgh
philadelphia
omaha
oklahoma
nyc
north texas
north carolina
new orleans
new mexico
new jersey
new hampshire
minneapolis/st. paul
milwaukee
michigan
miami
maine
madison
la
kansas city
hudson mohawk
houston
hawaii
dc
columbus
colorado
cleveland
chicago
charlottesville
buffalo
boston
binghamton
big muddy
baltimore
austin
atlanta
asheville
arkansas
arizona
valencia
united kingdom
ukraine
toulouse
toscana
torun
thessaloniki
switzerland
sverige
scotland
saint-petersburg
russia
romania
roma
portugal
poland
piemonte
paris/ãŽle-de-france
oost-vlaanderen
norway
nice
netherlands
napoli
nantes
marseille
malta
madrid
lombardia
lille
liege
la plana
italy
istanbul
ireland
imc patras
hungary
grenoble
germany
galiza
euskal herria
estrecho / madiaq
emilia-romagna
cyprus
croatia
calabria
bulgaria
bristol
belgrade
belgium
belarus
barcelona
austria
athens
armenia
antwerpen
andorra
alacantThis site made manifest by dadaIMC software
Re: UFPJ (in DC)...That Horrible Sinking Feeling
Date Edited: 02 Sep 2005 12:36:14 AM
That's a not-so-subtle way of calling the prior-posted comments "stupid." That's quite a charge. What specifically do you find to be of sub-par intelligence? Are you really surprised that someone might take offense at this statement? What if I simply dismissed your statement as not very intelligent? Would you not then seek at least elaboration? I think you owe us that unless you just felt like spewing meaningless bile.
u wrote->"I wish people would refrain from reporting as fact what is an opinion based on limited information."
Again, this is related to my criticism above. It's a very un-subtle way of dismissing the comments made prior to yours. Are you including Jim's in this? How are we to know? How do you know how much information someone has when making a statement? How could you possibly know, given that one of your complaints is that the comments are pseudonymous? You might want to think this one through a bit more.
u wrote->"I wish all this energy were devoted to actual organizing."
Nice sentiment. But again, could you be more specific? Do you mean acting on what UFPJ wants us to do? Or do you have another strategy in mind? If so, what is it?
u wrote->"In particular I find the use of that picture of Leslie Cagan completely unnecessary and offensive."
I remember the picture. I didn't know it was of Leslie Cagan (though knew her name, I don't recall ever seeing a picture of her before), but I distinctly remember not being offended in any way by the picture. I am really very curious about this comment. What exactly did you find offensive about it?
u wrote->"And I will record my name here - I wish others had the conviction to do the same. "
You're assuming a lot with this statement. People may choose anonymity or pseudonymity for several reasons. Do you honestly believe that the only possible reason could be lack of conviction? That's not just (again) insulting, but indicative of a lack of imagination (on this issue) which you may want to concern yourself about. Please think a little more before you post comments here. Thanks.