Interesting that criticisms of Churchill, or Chomsky etc for that matter, are limited to sound-bytes and character attacks of no substance. Offer an actual critique of the facts and information he presents, if you disagree with him. I don't see you doing that here, so until you do your criticism is without real merit.

It is actually possible to express disagreements with some of Churchill's views -- regarding 9-11, for example. Find out what he actually says, do your homework and try to refute it, and then say something intelligent if you can.