i didn't misspeak, as you unecessarily and snidly claim. nor do i see why you think so.

their is ample evidence for increased tax base through entertainment venues. this is so not contoversial or arguable. i was on committees during the bonding of entertainment venues in the penn quarter. i have seen the tax base estimates. i have seen the tax base fulfillments in the gallerty place/ penn quarter neighborhood. it is quite impressive.
you can find them via the dc.gov site. search for "Main streets". there sources are numerous. also search the office of planning site.

as for return on dc public services. do YOU have proof that dc job training programs and social services have a positive effect for the city at large? I doubt you do, and that evidence is definitely arguable. How many people from these programs are designing bridges or doing brain surgery? i'd bet zero.

it is an interesting accusation that you make though, and i do wish that investing in social service had a higher capital return than investing in stadiums. if you could prove this true, i would be very pleased to hear it. i do honestly prefer my tax money to help people in need, rather than those seeking diversions due to their ample free time and disposable income, but the bottom line isn't on our side.

and money for dc schools is a money pit. the corruption is far too great and with more in the system making over 100,000 than most other cities is criminal. our school system is a mockery that money will not solve.

if you wish to make a point, make it with facts, so we can use them to the advantage of our fellow cityfolk. our social services are failing and become lifelong crutches for people. we have generational poverty and families living on government assistance. how are our training programs helping?