worcester
western mass
vermont
urbana-champaign
tennessee
tampa bay
seattle
sarasota
santa cruz, ca
santa barbara
san francisco bay area
san francisco
san diego
saint louis
rogue valley
rochester
richmond
portland
pittsburgh
philadelphia
oklahoma
nyc
north texas
north carolina
new orleans
new mexico
new jersey
new hampshire
minneapolis/st. paul
milwaukee
michigan
miami
maine
madison
la
kansas city
hudson mohawk
houston
hawaii
dc
columbus
colorado
cleveland
chicago
charlottesville
buffalo
boston
binghamton
big muddy
baltimore
austin
atlanta
asheville
arkansas
arizona
valencia
united kingdom
ukraine
toulouse
toscana
torun
thessaloniki
switzerland
sverige
scotland
saint-petersburg
russia
romania
roma
portugal
poland
piemonte
paris/ãŽle-de-france
oost-vlaanderen
norway
nice
netherlands
napoli
nantes
marseille
malta
madrid
lombardia
lille
liege
la plana
italy
istanbul
ireland
imc patras
hungary
grenoble
germany
galiza
euskal herria
estrecho / madiaq
emilia-romagna
cyprus
croatia
calabria
bulgaria
bristol
belgrade
belgium
belarus
barcelona
austria
athens
armenia
antwerpen
andorra
alacantThis site made manifest by dadaIMC software
Re: Re: Re: DC Central Kitchen; Stadium Groundbreaking
Date Edited: 08 May 2006 11:09:26 AM
Isn't there always some other gigantic public works project on the table such that even if anything ultimately trickles down it does so at a rate that keeps only the contractors prosperous?
Maybe, the city is better off with a much lower tax base if it means that the basic services of people in the city are met or at least are as fair as can be to all who have a stake in the city. Perhaps, it is better in the name of ending class stratification that we as a whole (taken as a gross sum - pun intended) so that more as individuals do better.
That will cause it's own set of problems, but at least it will be our problems for us to solve and not the problems for those who hold the keys to solve.