Gee, you're right! Georgetown students, if they really wanted to help the poor, ought to be studying union busting strategies and sweatshop management! Only the harshest capitalists are ethical. Hell, you know what would really decrease the price of clothing? If we could get someone to farm cotton for free... Oh wait... And you know what? All students who go to a good university are the same! Yep, they are all RICH, WHITE, SNOTTY BRATS! They all live on trust funds, have butlers, and only protest because it makes daddy mad! None of them are on scholarships, work during school, or actually care about other people! Your analysis is so insightful. Wait a minute...

The only reason Wal-Mart's cheap goods exist is because of sweatshop labor, union busting, and unfair compensation. Your argument is the typical divide-and-conquer strategies: pit the poor against each other so that they can never overthrow oppression and make sure they turn against people from a different class organizing to protest capitalism (you know, instead of becoming b-school grads). I'm not sure you have ground to criticize the Georgetown students who organized this protest. Many of them were involved in a long struggle to get living wages for Georgetown employees.. You know, the poor wal-mart shoppers you talk about. What have you done to concretely improve the lives of people in the district? Anything but making essentialist, baseless adhom arguments on a website? Probably not...