worcester
western mass
vermont
urbana-champaign
tennessee
tampa bay
seattle
sarasota
santa cruz, ca
santa barbara
san francisco bay area
san francisco
san diego
saint louis
rogue valley
rochester
richmond
portland
pittsburgh
philadelphia
omaha
oklahoma
nyc
north texas
north carolina
new orleans
new mexico
new jersey
new hampshire
minneapolis/st. paul
milwaukee
michigan
miami
maine
madison
la
kansas city
hudson mohawk
houston
hawaii
dc
columbus
colorado
cleveland
chicago
charlottesville
buffalo
boston
binghamton
big muddy
baltimore
austin
atlanta
asheville
arkansas
arizona
valencia
united kingdom
ukraine
toulouse
toscana
torun
thessaloniki
switzerland
sverige
scotland
saint-petersburg
russia
romania
roma
portugal
poland
piemonte
paris/ãŽle-de-france
oost-vlaanderen
norway
nice
netherlands
napoli
nantes
marseille
malta
madrid
lombardia
lille
liege
la plana
italy
istanbul
ireland
imc patras
hungary
grenoble
germany
galiza
euskal herria
estrecho / madiaq
emilia-romagna
cyprus
croatia
calabria
bulgaria
bristol
belgrade
belgium
belarus
barcelona
austria
athens
armenia
antwerpen
andorra
alacantThis site made manifest by dadaIMC software
How this would go down in IRAQ
Date Edited: 21 Oct 2007 07:55:28 PM
An equivalent incident in Iraq would go like this: The pro-US puppet government in Iraq has some kind of large meeting in the Green Zone, and resistance fighters launch mortar rounds. One of the mortar shells has a defective propellant charge and clips the Green Zone wall, bouncing back before detonating and striking a civilian vehicle.
In Iraq, mortar shells EXPLODE, something bricks generally don't do. An incident like this in Iraq ususally leads to multiple civilian deaths. Yet few outside the US seriously suggest that the Iraqi Resistance should stop using mortars and rockets, choosing instead to just submit to occupation. For that matter, few suggest that Iraqi insurgents confine their weaponry to bricks and stones, which would do far less damage but could never win the war.
Now let's consider what happens in Iraq when the US tries to attack a meeting of Resistance leaders. In such missions the he US uses, not bricks, nor even mortar shells, but 2,000 pound bombs dropped from aircraft. Even if every bomb is somehow a direct hit(with no shorts or overs), people in neighboring houses get killed or permanently disabled as their homes collapse on top of them.
Yet, the wealthy GOP'ers who support the war(some of whom live in Georgetown) do not choose to discontinue their occupation of Iraq to put an end to incidents like this, nor to whole families being slaughtered by panicky Blackwater mercenaries.
Let's get real, folks! This was a stone(not even a brick by some reports), not a bomb, and thanks to that this woman is still with us, still able to stand and have her picture taken. Yes, if she is a worker in one of the stores or otherwise not one of the targetted yuppies we should take up a collection for her medical expenses, just like we do for our own people if they are arrested or injured. Some insurgent groups in Iraq have done this, we should too.
It is good that our medics offered assistance at the scene, and most combat medics of whatever forces would do the same.
That 12 year old boy who had his arms blown off and his face burned away at the start of the Iraq war(in another notorious incident of "collateral damage" was not so lucky. I'd rather take a brick in the face than a bomb hit(or a bullet like DeOnte Rawlings got)) any day.
Lastly, you may ask what in hell Iraq hasd to do with the IMF and World Bank? Well, the IMF still wants repayment for loans Saddam Hussein took out to build palaces for the rich(like himself). That's like asking residents of Anacostia to pay higher taxes to bail out bad mortgages on $1M homes in Georgetown!