Washington, DC Independent Media Center : http://dc.indymedia.org
Home
Washington, DC Independent Media Center

Re: Iraq-style Checkpoints put the "occupied" in Occupied DC

I lived in North East DC for two years. I also lived by the notorious Magnolia projects in New Orleans for many years. In other words, no need to "challenge" me.

But really, this is a silly little exercise -- one doesn't have to have personally experienced police-state actions to oppose them. But those who have endured such things generally DO oppose it. The notion that it's worth turning poor people's neighborhoods into giant police cordons, and that you can justify overt violations of civil rights and Constitutional protections in the name of law enforcement is ridiculous.

Consider that there's little rush to blockade and create police encampments in suburbs and richer neighborhoods, despite the fact that crimes occur there, too -- drug use, drunk driving, prostitution, white collar crime, etc. When you DO see a larger police presence in those areas, there's a big difference -- the police in poor neighborhoods are watching the people who LIVE there and visit there; the police in middle-class and rich neighborhoods are not policing the residents or their visitors, they are looking for people "invading" from the poor neighborhoods, by and large.

Police treat everyone living in or visiting poor communities as suspects and potential criminals; police treat everyone living in or visiting more affluent communities as potential victims of crimes. Meanwhile, again there is the overriding point that the only "attention" those poor communities get is from guys with guns and handcuffs, otherwise they are neglected and ignored and treated like unwanted, unimportant members of society. Law enforcement tends to be the only government agencies interested in them, and NOT for the benefit of the communities.

Further, as already noted, most of the crimes actually being "policed" are non-violent, personal-behavior activities. Talk all you want about murder and violence, but the majority of the crimes are in fact drug related non-violent types (possession, distribution by low-level street dealers), or crimes related directly to addiction (theft to support an addiction, prostitution to support an addiction or in exchange for drugs).

You don't see those thing happening to support buying beer and cigarettes. Our drug laws directly create most of the social "problems" associated with drug use -- problems you don't see in relation to alcohol and cigarettes, unless you go back to the years of alcohol prohibition. The comparison is striking, and anyone remotely familiar with the facts and stats and who is remotely honest about it can see the truth.

So for all the talk of the violence in those areas making it "worth" tolerating occupation by armed police forces who are violating civil liberties, the fact is that these checkpoints and the large police presence in fact is overwhelmingly targeting and "catching" low-level non-violent crimes mostly related directly or indirectly to the drug market.

And the residents know this. You can go to any poor community in any state across this nation, and talk to them about it, and the people living there have a very clear, informed viewpoint on the real reasons for the police presence and the real ramifications for their neighborhood and society as a whole.

But of course, most of you right-wingers and those who would say you are "all for" "occupation" don't care how the residents really feel, or about the true reasons or real outcomes. You see cops all over the place, and it inherently appeals to you, beyond any supposed justifications. You aren't out there calling for more schools, better roads, jobs, more education, less racially and financially skewed law enforcement, etc -- uniformed, armed patrols are the only time you raise your voice in supposed "support" for "helping" these communities.

It's transparent, and we know what you really are and really think. So why lie? You know we aren't buying it, and we know that you know we know. Just say, "We support armed patrols of poor people and non-whites, and other than that we don't care what happens to them." Say it, because it's what you really think and really mean and we know it. Stop wasting your time and energy making ridiculous, uninformed, obviously false claims and arguments pretending to have motives we know you don't really have. You just end up looking as foolish as you really are.
 
Add a new comment
Title
Author
Text Format

Comment

Anti-spam Enter the following number into the box:
To add more detailed comments, or to upload files, see the full comment form.

Comments

Re: Re: Iraq-style Checkpoints put the "occupied" in Occupied DC

I say, take the cops out and let it go to survival of the fittest...then see who wants the cops back in...I bet it will be the residents
 

Re: Re: Iraq-style Checkpoints put the "occupied" in Occupied DC

Drew,
Your comment begs the question....Why did you leave these great neighborhoods?? Another question also looms, why were you in these neighborhoods to begin with....Gentrification??? If not, did you do nothing to better these communities??
 

Account Login



Forgot your password?

Media Centers

Syndication feeds

Views

This site made manifest by dadaIMC software