|
A comment on RCP's current "Battle for the Future" campaign (part 1): Hysteria about "fascism" serves to hide the essential role of the Democratic Party in the political and economic system of imperialism
The main content of the leaflet is hysteria-mongering over the supposedly impending fascist danger from Bush and company. The RCP's leaflet (which really needs to be read to be fully appreciated) says that it is an "open question" whether any democratic rights at all will remain by the end of Bush's term. Of couse all serious activists are concerned about the steady and increasing erosion of our civil and democratic rights. And yes, if Bush and company had their way, most of us probably would be rounded up and sent to interrogation/torture camps like those in Guantanamo Bay. But so what? Bush cannot make any major changes in how this country is run without the support and backing of the ruling bourgeoisie (ie: the class of big-time capitalists who own or control the corporations, the politicians, the police, courts, schools and media personalities) as a whole. And the bourgeoisie in the US has no compelling material interest, under present circumstances, that would lead it to endorse such a reckless gamble as would be involved in attempting the wholesale elimination of democratic rights and plunging the US into fascism.
Such a desperate course of action by the bourgeoisie would: As a general rule, the bourgeoisie of any modern, economically developed nation has only resorted to fascist measures (ie: the forcible suppression of all opposition via arrest, torture, summary execution or death squads) within the home country in periods of extreme crisis -- when its class rule was threatened. These, for example, were the circumstances in which the German bourgeoisie made its infamous gamble on Hitler. But the bourgeoisie does not prefer fascism (which it considers as clumsy and ill-suited to the needs of capitalist development in a modern economy). Rather the bourgeoisie prefers ordinary bourgeois democracy in which its class rule is carefully hidden behind a screen of supposedly democratic institutions (ie: parliaments, the so-called "free press" and the various legal parties which serve to pacify the masses with sweet songs). The RCP's leaflet does not mention any of the above factors which would restrain the bourgeoisie from endorsing such a desperate gamble as would be entailed by plunging the US into fascism.
Rather, the RCP's leaflet panders to (ie: encourages and reinforces) the worst and most naive prejudices (which are, unfortunately, all-too-common amongst most new activists) that some kind of fundamental distinction exists between the twin ruling parties of US imperialism. (Of course there are distinctions between these two parties -- but these distinctions are more in the way of a division of labor between committed partners in which (1) the Democratic Party makes concessions to the mass movements when the people are aroused and (2) the Republicans then take back the concessions once the Democratic Party has managed to suck the life out of the mass movements and lull the masses back to sleep.) Historically, the struggle against fascism has been used as an excuse to unite progressive activists with bourgeois parties in such a way that the progressive activists surrendered their independent agenda and became subordinate to the bourgeois parties. This, for example, is how the CPUSA (ie: the original Communist Party in the US) betrayed the workers and became subordinate to the Democratic Party machine in the mid-to-late 1930's. I suspect however, that the RCP's current campaign of hysteria over fascism may have less to do with justifying unprincipled alliances with liberal-bourgeois trends -- and more to do with simply recruiting activists who (unaware that the current climate of repression is not more severe than the Palmer Raids of 1918-21 or the McCarthyite witchhunts, jailings and blacklists during the Cold War 1950's) may be somewhat alarmed by the comparatively mild (ie: compared to open fascism) forms of repression which activists in the U.S. face today.
In any event, RCP's recent leaflet is profoundly mistaken and does a disservice to the movement. The struggle against increasing repression will be far more powerful and effective when based on a solid, class-based analysis of how the bourgeois political system really works than on the basis of hysteria over a supposedly impending fascist danger. When activists understand how our society really works -- how all the institutions and levers of capitalist society are part of a single orchestra -- they often experience a transformation from feeling powerless and being powerless -- to feeling powerful and being powerful -- because they understand at last how the ruling class, in spite of its seemingly all-powerful appearance -- is actually only a tiny minority in society -- and that this minority cannot rule by force alone -- that this minority stands in opposition to the material interests of the overwhelming majority of society -- and can only continue to rule as long as it is able to maintain an increasingly vulnerable system of political deception. And when we understand how our movement is being held back -- when we understand the true weaknesses of our enemy -- and the true strengths of our own forces -- we will be far better prepared for the day when talk of fascism may be more than crying wolf.
requires public criticism today Finally -- for those supporters of the RCP or RCYB who may believe that this article is somehow "anti-party" -- understand that sincere criticism is often the most powerful form of genuine support. The RCP, through its decades of hard work such as in writing articles in support of the struggles of our class brothers and sisters here in the US and around the world, has earned the respect of many activists. But this only makes it all the more important to criticise its errors. The object of this article is not simply to defend our movement against wrong ideas or even to assist the RCP to overcome its errors. There is also a larger purpose. If activists today are to successfully confront the challenges of our times -- then we must make serious and systematic use of all of the possibilities of the unfolding revolution in digital communications -- for the purpose of helping all of us understand the strengths and weaknesses of all the trends on the left. Only in this way will we be able to build a conscious revolutionary mass movement and assemble the talent and dedication needed for a genuinely revolutionary mass organization. Such an organization would not only be able to distribute millions of copies of a leaflet (as RCP aims to do with this one) but (equally important) would also have the ability to defend its views in forums (such as this Indymedia thread) in ways that are concise, informative and even entertaining.
Ben Seattle -- January 28, 2005
Connected to one another no force on earth can stop us.
|
|
|
|
worcester
western mass
vermont
urbana-champaign
tennessee
tampa bay
seattle
sarasota
santa cruz, ca
santa barbara
san francisco bay area
san francisco
san diego
saint louis
rogue valley
rochester
richmond
portland
pittsburgh
philadelphia
oklahoma
nyc
north texas
north carolina
new orleans
new mexico
new jersey
new hampshire
minneapolis/st. paul
milwaukee
michigan
miami
maine
madison
la
kansas city
hudson mohawk
houston
hawaii
dc
columbus
colorado
cleveland
chicago
charlottesville
buffalo
boston
binghamton
big muddy
baltimore
austin
atlanta
asheville
arkansas
arizona
valencia
united kingdom
ukraine
toulouse
toscana
torun
thessaloniki
switzerland
sverige
scotland
saint-petersburg
russia
romania
roma
portugal
poland
piemonte
patras
paris/ãŽle-de-france
oost-vlaanderen
norway
nice
netherlands
napoli
nantes
marseille
malta
madrid
lombardia
lille
liege
la plana
italy
istanbul
ireland
hungary
grenoble
germany
galiza
euskal herria
estrecho / madiaq
emilia-romagna
cyprus
croatia
calabria
bulgaria
bristol
belgrade
belgium
belarus
barcelona
austria
athens
armenia
antwerpen
andorra
alacant
abruzzoThis site made manifest by dadaIMC software
Comments
Re: RCP Cries
I'm not sure this is just a propaganda tactic. They clearly believe that something qualitatively different is happening in the US government -- and I share the fear.
Is it just "compelling material interest" that leads the ruling class to install fascism, or is it more complicated than that?
It can be argued that there are "compelling" interests that have unleashed the new war against everyone -- and the changes in legal structure, collapse of the Democrats as anything like an effective opposition and well-developed social base for fascism are all real.
Delay. Gonzalez. Rumsfeld. These are names we know. What about the Christian fundamentalists who are largely running the Pentagon? What about the purges of the CIA? What is the effect of media consolidation? And so on...
I think the RCP's analysis is correct in terms of the danger we are facing. I also think that radicals need to think through what the implications of it are for what they are doing now. The right isn't playing around. They are very focused and intent on putting this country together in a vastly more repressive and militarist way. They publically defend torture -- something the Nazis didn't even do!
The distribution of the RCP paper is also something to take note of. It's not enough to put flyers up in hip bars and East Village bathrooms. People need to be thinking in the millions with everything they do.
Re: RCP Cries
Thanks for your thoughtful reply. These are important
questions and all discussion is welcome.
> Is it just "compelling material interest"
> that leads the ruling class to install fascism,
> or is it more complicated than that?
99 percent of the complication lies in accurately
understanding the compelling material interest at
stake.
The changes we have seen since 9-11 (ie: the wars
in Afganistan and Iraq, the increasing repression
at home, the refusal of the Democratic Party to
lift a finger to oppose any of this) are a clear
reflection of the class interest of the bourgeoisie.
The Soviet Union collapsed. Now is the time for
U.S. imperialism to establish unrivalled hegemony
over the Middle East and the world's oil supply
in order to better compete against European
imperialism and what is left of Russian power
and to prepare for inevitable conflict with the
rising power of China. Oil is the most strategic
of commodities and control of the largest oil
reserves in the world (ie: permanent military
bases in the heart of the Middle East next to
Iran, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, UAE, etc) will give
U.S. imperialism immense leverage for decades
against both India and China which need oil for
development.
But the bourgeoisie does not have a compelling
need for fascism at this time. Bush will push,
of course, but will not exceed the limits of
his leash. Bush is irritated at the confines
of his leash -- but if he failed to respect
this leash he would be bounced around like a
rubber ball.
The bourgeoisie has much to _lose_ by unleashing
fascism. I advanced three arguments in my essay
above. I repeat them here:
Such a desperate course of action by the bourgeoisie would:
(a) instantly politicize tens of millions of people,
(b) destablize the entire system of bourgeois rule and
(c) destroy illusions in the bourgeois political system
. that the bourgeoisie has carefully crafted and
. painstakingly cultivated over many decades.
We need to understand these arguments concretely.
A good start would be to recognize that they require
a reply.
> What about the Christian fundamentalists who are
> largely running the Pentagon? What about the purges
> of the CIA?
What about them? What do these things prove? Different
sections of the bourgeoisie will have squabbles with
one another. It is fine to be aware of these squabbles
but we should be careful not to exaggerate their
significance. The main thing to keep in mind -- is
that the bourgeoisie is united by its common class
interest -- and this common class interest requires
keeping society running in a smooth and stable way.
Fascism is notoriously unstable. Bourgeois class
interests are better served (under present circumstances)
by a system that keeps the majority of the population
complacent and under the illusion that they live in a
"democracy".
In my view, browser, your thinking tends to overlook
the fact that the bourgeoisie cannot rule by force
alone -- cannot rule without political deception.
If the Christian fundamentalists even thought about
slipping their leash -- they would be disciplined
and humiliated. The general who recently talked
about how much fun it is to kill people, for example,
was told to shut up. The bourgeoisie as a whole
(and in particular the section which specializes
in political deception -- the liberals) understands
that a ounce of political deception can be more
effective (and cheaper) than a ton of force -- and
that the fascist-minded who talk too loud must
have their mouths washed out with soap lest they
give the game away.
It is important to undertand how our society really
works and to understand that the bourgeoisie would
not be able to maintain their class rule for very
long without the effective use of political
deception. Understanding this will energize and
motivate activists -- because as we build a
conscious movement we will build with it an
increasing powerful weapon that will puncture the
political deception of the bourgeoisie.
And this will change everything.
> The distribution of the RCP paper is also
> something to take note of. It's not enough
> to put flyers up in hip bars and East Village
> bathrooms. People need to be thinking in the
> millions with everything they do.
Yes it is a very good thing that the RCP is
developing a machine that can distribute a
million leaflets independent of the mainstream
bourgeois media. But this cannot amount to much
if the RCP is unable to defend its views in forums
such as this one.
Finally, browser, since you have made the same post
in response to my article on Indymedia sites in
New York, Chicago, DC and Denver -- I will make it
easier for you if you want to expand your challenge.
I have posted on the following theads:
seattle.indymedia.org/en/2005/01/244358.shtml
portland.indymedia.org/en/2005/02/310064.shtml
la.indymedia.org/news/2005/02/122188.php
www.indybay.org/news/2005/02/1719881.php
sf.indymedia.org/news/2005/02/1710707.php
madison.indymedia.org/newswire/display/21620/index.php
houston.indymedia.org/news/2005/02/37243.php
colorado.indymedia.org/newswire/display/10161/index.php
boston.indymedia.org/newswire/display/33323/index.php
atlanta.indymedia.org/newswire/display/36407/index.php
buffalo.indymedia.org/display.php3
chicago.indymedia.org/newswire/display/52350/index.php
michiganimc.org/newswire/display/9305/index.php
dc.indymedia.org/newswire/display/116938/index.php
nyc.indymedia.org/newswire/display/140883/index.php
cleveland.indymedia.org/news/2005/02/14568.php
www.phillyimc.org/article.pl
Go ahead. Reply to me elsewhere (I think that supporters
of the RCP may need a little help, if not adult supervision,
in Atlanta). I am in favor of wider discussion.
Sincerely and revolutionary regards,
Ben Seattle
struggle.net/ben