Washington, DC Independent Media Center : http://dc.indymedia.org
Home
Washington, DC Independent Media Center

Commentary :: [none]

CNI, the Holocaust and Pete McCloskey

The Council for the National Interest is categorically appalled by what happened to the Jews in Europe during World War II, which is called the Holocaust, and recognizes the utter horrors of state sponsored terrorism against a race, national or religious group whenever or wherever it occurs. In the memory of many of us, it happened to Jews, to black South Africans, Kurds, Tutsi, Muslim Bosnians, Chechens, and to Palestinians, which is called the Nakba or Catastrophe. In our grandparents’ time, it happened to Armenians, and before that, to native Americans and Africans during the Middle Passage.
All Americans need to understand how and why a state may turn against or enslave a people, with the purpose of exploiting or obliterating them, and to wholeheartedly condemn such political acts.

When its founding chairman Pete McCloskey addressed a conference of the Institute for Historical Review some five years ago, he was not representing the Council for the National Interest. Board members are not responsible to clear their speaking engagements with CNI, and CNI was not even aware of the address until many months after it was made. In any event, Rep. McCloskey later distanced himself from the Institute when he wrote the president of the Institute, Mark Weber, “there was a deliberate policy of extermination of Jews, Poles, gypsies and homosexuals by the Nazi leadership,” and suggested that the Institute give up it views about the Holocaust and focus instead on the distortions of truth promoted by the Anti-Defamation League – one of which was to claim that McCloskey was a Holocaust denier. For McCloskey’s views, see the archives of the San Francisco Examiner, story by Dan Evans April 1, 2002.

CNI is immensely proud of the contribution that Pete McCloskey has made over the years to the American political process, including an appearance in 2003 at a Tikkun Conference in Washington, and toward helping Americans – and especially Jewish Americans – understand that the interests of a foreign state such as Israel, among a number of countries in the Middle East, are not the same as American interests.

As for the address that Mr. McCloskey gave to the Institute, interested readers are able to read the speech for itself elsewhere on the dc.indymedia.com website. He was not addressing the issue of the Holocaust itself, but was focusing on the power of the Israeli lobby in the United States in stopping debate on the merits of Israeli policy toward the Palestinians. He was especially eager to bring listeners attention to the illegal activities of the Anti-Defamation League, which he and a group of local activists successfully sued for spying in 2002.

There is no doubt that the Holocaust took place, that it created a profound crisis for the Jewish people, and that it had a profound repercussion on the people of Palestine, who in fact did not participate in it. They, rather than the perpetrators of the Holocaust, have been obliged to accommodate the victims, and to pay for it by ceding their land, property, rights, and until recently their identity. Great social injustices must be rectified, as we think the majority of Americans believe. This can be done through the creation of an independent Palestine, in which its citizens may live as freely as the descendants of victims of the Holocaust now live in Israel.
 
 
Add a new comment
Title
Author
Text Format

Comment

Anti-spam Enter the following number into the box:
To add more detailed comments, or to upload files, see the full comment form.

Comments

Re: CNI, the Holocaust and Pete McCloskey

Why did Mr. McCloskey choose to speak before the IHR in the first place?
 

Re: CNI, the Holocaust and Pete McCloskey

it might have been to take our minds off of what the corporate government of the u.s. is doing to the lower three fourths of the population. they don't want us to realize the lowering of public education, increased polution, more crippled and contaminated cannon fodder and cut the veterans affairs budget. no-bid contracts for the politcally invested copmpanies. etc.
 

Re: CNI, the Holocaust and Pete McCloskey

It's taken too long, but personally I'm glad to see this addressed by CNI.

One wonders, more than a little, why (as this letter spells out) McCloskey would take a group of holocaust denial racists, with connections to the National Alliance, and make the suggestion that they needed was to attack the ADL instead of, and here's a nutty thought, getting over their underlying racism and agenda of hate. By pointing out McCloskey's suggestion is CNI suggesting that this is an appropriate thing to do with a group of racists? Tell them to subvert it and go after more acceptable targets?

All that said, personally I'm glad to see CNI begin to take this issue seriously and a make step toward distancing itself from its founder and chair being the keynote speaker at the premier holocaust denial conference.
 

Re: CNI, the Holocaust and Pete McCloskey

"while the jewish girl goes credit card shopping "

sums up the mindset of the typical Indymedia editor perfectly.
 

Re: CNI, the Holocaust and Pete McCloskey

John,

I don't get paid to do ANYTHING on indymedia.

You can post your retraction right here on this thread.
 

Re: CNI, the Holocaust and Pete McCloskey

Alchymedia: In an earlier post you said that CNI had some modest media budget and that you'd done some media work for them. Did I misunderstand? Have you never received pay from CNI? It seemed like a pretty clear statement that you had been paid by them for some media work. If I misunderstood, then I think it's an undertsandable mistake, but I certainly would take back my quesitons.

It's relevant ift you have received pay from an organization that you also cover. I assume you've been paying attention to the conflict of interest scandals recently in mainstream media lately. It's also relevant if you've received pay from an organizaiton that's covered in an online news site that you have editorial authority at.

I don't think or imagine that CNI ever paid you for
"indymedia work". I don't think there's any kind of insidious plot or bad intent going on--which I've said before.

I'm not sure about whether or not the content you've posted on indymedia w/the CNI tagline was work you were compensated before. It really wouldn't change things all that much one way or the other because reporters--citizen, mainstream, indymedia, what have you--have an ethical obligation to make it clear when they've been compensated (at any time) by a group they're covering (even when that compensation doesn't relate to the story). The same is true of editors. You've got a background in journalism, yes? I don't think I'm saying anything you don't know or that is particularly contentious.

I
 

Re: CNI, the Holocaust and Pete McCloskey

If you are so concerned about the nature of my media work, you can contact me privately, you know how. Please stop your unsubstantiated speculations/accusations in this public forum -- this is the second request.
 

Re: CNI, the Holocaust and Pete McCloskey

I wonder if the Jewish Girls Creit card will be found in th eTel Aviv rubble?
 

Re: CNI, the Holocaust and Pete McCloskey

Alchymedia, it's not any kind of accusation. You brought up the relationship in a comment. I never imagined in a million years prior to that that the possibility that you had done payed work, or might sitll be doing payed work, for CNI while simultaneously publishing and editing stories about them on Indymedia. I checked in to see if what you implied in your comment was definitely the case, since I was pretty surprised by it, and you're now not answering the question.

Ok then, I'll certainly drop it. Not like I have or want any coercive power to demand an answer or anything. When the issue gets raised, I think people reporting on and editing stories should disclose if they've done or are doing work for an organization being covered. If you don't feel that way, or just don't want to answer it regarding your own work, then fine.

While I'm dropping it, I hope you'll eventually reconsider your choice. Stories on Indymedia are reporting. Editing is editing, online or off. And disclosing that sort of thing publicly, or clarifying if that there is no such past or present relationship if it comes up, is just common sense and practice.

Good luck with your work.
 

Re: CNI, the Holocaust and Pete McCloskey

Earlier a comment of mine on this article was rightfully hidden, but for whatever reason, that comment was unhidden and is appearing once again. If the comment is going to stay (and again, I'd ask that it be removed), I'd like to set the record straight...

I misunderstood a comment Alchymedia made about his relationship with CNI (made in the comments of another story), which led to the earlier remark here of "... since the group is paying individuals to create and post material here it helps to know where they stand."

I was corrected and the comment was rightfully removed. If it's going to be here, I want folks to know that...

1. I misunderstood a comment and was wrong.
2. Alcyhymedia has clarified that, whatever the working relationship with CNI he had alluded to might have been, it did not involve being paid by CNI to produce media and post it here on Indymedia.

I may not agree with Alchymedia on some significant points, but I certainly trust him, and so I want to set the record straight on that.
 

Re: CNI, the Holocaust and Pete McCloskey

Thanks John,

We often don't agree, but I'm most grateful for your statement of trust. Email and the internet is not a perfect medium for communication. I look forward to building a wider foundation of mutual trust. IMC is all about process...
 

Re: CNI, the Holocaust and Pete McCloskey

I just read an article about a billboard advertisement that was not allowed by that particular billboard company. A group called Revolt of the Elders headed up by our Pete McCloskey was responsible for the Ad that has subsequently been pulled.
Could you please have someone contact me. I am in the billboard business and have an equal disregard for John Doolittle. I'd be pleased to discuss one of our good high profile billboards on the same Interstate 80 corridor with the representative. Please advise as to how I can get in touch with the Congressman, or his representative. Thank you.
 

Account Login



Forgot your password?

Media Centers

Syndication feeds

Views

This site made manifest by dadaIMC software