Bringing the Ron Paul racists out of the woodwork.

Keep it up!

And who is this alleged racist you speek of comming out of the woodwork???

The problem with crying wolf once too often, is that when the wolf actually does make its appearance no one will come to help one.

No the problem with crying wolf when there is a wolf but there is also Ron Paul supporters around is they will make up some crazy conspiracy about how the Wolf is a ZOG agent or that it was a ghost-wolf or some bullshit. I think you people can't handle it when a person of color stands up and says fuck your stupid racism, you cannot stand when they demand their rights which have been trampled on by people like Ron Paul and many many many many many people before that!

in responce let me quote an old punk guy, Ian MacKaye...
I'm sorry
For something I didn't do
Lynched somebody
But I don't know who
You blame me for slavery
A hundred years before I was born

GUILTY OF BEING WHITE

I'm a convict
GUILTY
Of a racist crime
GUILTY
I've only served
GUILTY
19 years of my time

... and I bet I'm racis also just cuz im white, funny how that works

The problem is not Ron Paul or his supporters, but some nameless faceless person on the internet, regurgitating the incredible rantings and accusations of one Bill White (a person in need of intense psychiatric care).

You need to get a grip. May we suggest some days in a padded cell, it may do you a world of good.

There is nothing in this article about Bill White, it's all Paul and it's a speech HE made before congress.

He made it, he owns it. A very good blogger from the black community responded to it. The article gets posted so the readers here can understand who Ron Paul really is.

Stalkers and people who need restraining orders from local activist organizations are usually those in need of a padded cell.

That libelers and slanderers who spread lies and innuendoes on the internet sometimes end up with large legal fees?

Ron Paul denied making any such statements. He accepted responsibility for them because a person working on his newsletter made them. They were most definitely not Paul's sentiments though. That person was fired for making them.

As the New York Times and other publications have reported, the style and tone of the statements
were totally unlike anything Paul had/has said previouly or subsequently. The articles in question also were written some time ago.

It may behoove you to focus on the big picture, such as the erosion of political and civil rights, imperialistic wars abroad and the pending economic
meltdown. Ron Paul is small time compared to that.

Running battles with slow witted racist street thugs may get your blood racing, but they are nothing compared to the battles that must be waged against quick witted corporate thugs inhabiting the boardrooms and meeting rooms of the seats of power.

I know it when I see it and it seems to be angry with me today.

Ron Paul's a racist? Is that why he supported honoring Muhammad Ali? http://www.govtrack.us/congress/record.xpd?id=110-h20070117-38&bill=hr110-58#sMonofilemx003Ammx002Fmmx002Fmmx002Fmhomemx002Fmgovtrackmx002Fmdatamx002Fmusmx002Fm110mx002Fmcrmx002Fmh20070117-38.xmlElementm12m0m0m

First off use one of those link shorteners! Also it should be noted he didn't support a medal for a civil rights hero, namely Rosa Parks. He also did a lot of other nasty racist things such as his articles in his little report "The Ron Paul Survival Report" and made some B.S. comments against distinguished congresswomen Barbara Jordan, you can read all about it here at this fine blog article:
bluedogthoughts.newsvine.com/_news/2007/07/31/868483-thoughts-on-the-ron-paul-poltical-report-and-racism

He actually wanted to pay for the medal out of his pocket instead of waste tax payer dollars, but no one else in congress wanted to shell out the money. Way to fail.

First, who says the Blogger is a Respectable Black Man. Plenty of Respectable Black Men Have Supported Ron Paul because they Know Ron Paul and are Not some random Moron Crying for Unconstitutional Rights That Do Not Make Their Race Equal As It Should Be. Affirmative Action Is Not Constitutional And It Does Not Make African Americans Equal. This Isn't About Whether Or Not A Black Man Should Be Able To Be Treated At A Hospital If White Doctors Want To Deny Him. This Is About Meeting Bogus Quotas To Appease A Race Over Everyone Else When It Comes To Things Like Hiring. That Is Unconstitutional. Public Things, Such As Hospitals Are For Everyone But If Some College Has To Choose Between a White Man VS A BLACK MAN the Person they Should Choose is the More Qualified Asian Student Who Got Better Grades Who You Morons Are Not Even Mentioning. It is About Who Is Better Qualified, That Is America. Not Who Is Forced. Sooner Or Later, Everyone Who Remembers A Time Before Black Civil Rights Will Be Dead As Well As Womens Civil Rights Just As Those That Remember Slavery Are Long Dead. Their Children Will Grow Up With A TV Just Like Every Other Child And By God If They Mention Slavery As If They Had To Suffer It Themselves For Some Kind Reason To Hate The Future White Children Who Grew Up With Them Because Of The Bitterness Of Their Parents Than Only Their Parents Will Be To Blame For Holding Their Children Back From Being Truely Equal In Society. This Crap People Pull Is Not What Martin Luther King Wanted. He Wanted His People To Hold Their Heads Up High And Constantly Look To The Future. He Would Be Ashamed Of Any Black Man Who Continued To Harbor That Hatred And Especially To Those That Did So As If They Deserved A Handout When They Suffered Nothing For The Movements To Become Free.

Even Wikipedia, A Very Biased/Edited Source Of Information, Could Not Discredit Ron Paul.

Newsletters published under Paul's name from 1978 through 1995 first became an issue in his 1996 run for Congress, when opponent Charles Morris ran numerous ads about the newsletters.[148][149] The newsletters, which carried various names over the years—Ron Paul's Freedom Report, Ron Paul Political Report, The Ron Paul Survival Report—,[150] sometimes contained derogatory comments concerning race and other politicians. Alluding to a contemporary scientific study finding that "of black men in Washington... about 85 percent are arrested at some point in their lives"[151][152] one issue proposed that "Given the inefficiencies of what D.C. laughingly calls the criminal justice system, I think we can safely assume that 95% of the black males in Washington DC are semi-criminal or entirely criminal", and stated that "the criminals who terrorize our cities ... largely are" young black males, who commit crimes "all out of proportion to their numbers".[153][154] Paul's campaign replied at the time that the quotes were taken out of context and misleading[150] and rejected Morris' demand to release back issues; Paul went on to win the election.[14]

In 2001, Paul took "moral responsibility" for the comments printed in the newsletters under his name, telling Texas Monthly magazine that the comments were written by unnamed writers and did not represent his views. He said newsletter remarks referring to U.S. Representative Barbara Jordan (calling her a "fraud" and a "half-educated victimologist" whose "race and sex protect her from criticism") were "the saddest thing, because Barbara and I served together and actually she was a delightful lady." The magazine defended Paul's decision to protect the writer's confidence in 1996, concluding, "In four terms as a U.S. congressman and one presidential race, Paul had never uttered anything remotely like this."[40] In 2007, with the quotes resurfacing, New York Times Magazine writer Christopher Caldwell concurred that Paul denied the allegations "quite believably, since the style diverges widely from his own", but added that Paul's "response to the accusations was not transparent."[14]

In January 2008, James Kirchick of The New Republic revived the controversy by publishing a story detailing the contents of several issues of the newsletters, including images of the actual pages of some of them.[155] His article concluded that Paul was an "angry white man", asserting that the newsletter showed "an obsession with conspiracies, sympathy for the right-wing militia movement, and deeply held bigotry against blacks, Jews, and gays", attacked Martin Luther King Jr. and offered "kind words" for David Duke.[150] Other issues gave tactical advice to right-wing militia groups and advanced various conspiracy theories.[156][157] Most of the incendiary items appeared between 1989 and 1994, a period in which Paul was not in office but in medical practice.[158] While the newsletters were published under Paul's name and frequently in the first person with personal interjections,[159] most lacked specific bylines for articles.

Paul disavowed the writings in a response to the New Republic article, saying that the quotations do not represent his beliefs, that he has "never uttered such words and denounce[s] such small-minded thoughts", and that Martin Luther King, Jr. and Rosa Parks were his personal heroes because they stood for individual rights. He again noted that he accepts "MORAL RESPONSIBILITY" for not paying closer attention to writings published under his name.[160] In a subsequent interview with CNN's Wolf Blitzer, he said he did not know who wrote the articles and stated he "[repudiates] everything that is written along those lines." Blitzer told Paul that he was "shocked" by the newsletters, because they did not seem to reflect "the Ron Paul that I've come to know, and the viewers have come to know" over the course of several interviews during the campaign.[161] David Gergen, CNN senior political analyst, commented "I don't think there's an excuse in politics to have something go out under your name and say, 'Oh by the way, I didn't write that'."[161][162]

In the interview with Blitzer, Paul asserted that racism is incompatible with his beliefs and that he sees people as individuals—not as part of collectives. He also dismissed the attack as an attempt to accuse him of racism by proxy, stating that he has collected more money among African-Americans than any other Republican candidate.[161] NELSON LINDER, president of the Austin chapter of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), defended Paul, saying that he has known him for 20 years, saw him as a "free thinker", "very intelligent and very informed", talking about "real issues" that "invite attacks on him", who was "correct in what he's saying", and that knowing his intent, he believes Paul has been misconstrued and taken out of context.[163] Former LA Times editor Andrew Malcolm noted that Paul got second place in the January 19 Nevada Republican caucus despite the recent reports about the newsletters.[164]

The identity of the author of the controversial pieces remains unknown, but Reason magazine identified then prominent paleolibertarian activist Lew Rockwell, who also served as Paul's congressional chief of staff from 1978 to 1982,[150] as "Paul's chief ghostwriter". The magazine also cites a 1993 tax document showing that Ron Paul & Associates reported an annual income of $940,000 for that year. The document listed four Ron Paul & Associates employees in Texas (Paul's family and Rockwell) and seven more employees around the country.[158] This now-defunct entity, in which Paul owned a minority stake, was during some periods the publisher of the newsletters; at other times, they were published by the Foundation for Rational Economics and Education, a nonprofit Paul founded in 1976.

The Man Took Moral Responsibility For It All Like A Man And Not A Politician. Even NELSON LINDER OF THE NAACP, Who I Believe is a Better Authority On Racism Then Any Of You Smucks, Defends Ron Paul Because He Knows Ron Paul. You All Need To Get Your Heads Out Of Your Own Self Righteous Butts And Stop Blindly Believing In Garbage.

Martin Luther King Might Have Support Efforts and Programs That Targeted Blacks Specifically To Help Them But He Never Would Have Supported A Program That Gave Racial Preferences. He Would Not Support A University "Lowering Its Standards" For His Fellow Negros. He Would Not Support That University Having To Meet A Quota And Thus Possibly Denying The More Qualified Asian American Student Per Se. He Just Wanted Negros To Have The Same Chances And Be Judged On Their Laurels And Not The Color Of Their Skin. Meeting Quotas Is The Exact Opposite. Judging Them By The Color Of Their Skin Instead Of What They Are Qualified For. He Would Support A National Negro College Fund, Yes But Not A University That Would Take X Amount Of Negros To Meet A Quota, While Possibly Denying Someone Else More Qualified. If The Negro Is More Qualified Than Thats When He Should Have The Equal Oppurtunity. You would All Shame Dr.King.

I happen to agree with Ron Paul's statements based ont the result of the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. He happens to be speaking the truth! It may be an unpleasant truth to a dyed-in-wool liberal, but IT IS THE TRUTH! Racial relations did not improve, in fact, they exploded into violence and hatred never seen before in this country. People should have liberties and rights, but the government is not the one to legislate rights to some while diminishing the rights of others.
If everyone that agrees with Paul's statements is a racist, then call me a racist. Who cares?

http://thingsimportanttoharry.blogspot.com/

Ron Paul's point of view on this (as i have heard him say in other speeches) is that government has no right to tell an individual how to run their buisness or lives. And that government cannot make people think how they want them to, and forcing some one to do something they dont want makes the situation worse. furthermore when people think that one group is getting privilages over another it creates animosity.

" Racism is simply an ugly form of collectivism, the mindset that veiws humans strictly as members of groups rather than individuals. By encouraging americans to adopt a group mentality, the advocates of so-called "diversity" actually perpetuate racism. their obsession with racial group identity is inherently racist. we should understand that racism will endure until we stop thinking in terms of groups and begin thinking in terms of individual liberty." - Congressman Dr.Ron Paul

"We do not get our rights because we are gay, black, white and so on. We have our rights because we are individuals endowed with them from our creator." Congressman Dr.Ron Paul

Ron Paul's hollow words are still just as meaningless as he said them after his own newsletters were brought up again. He is a racist and you can deny it up and down but if you look at his history you can see his racism and all the racists who support him. Thankfully he finally dropped out of the race. Even though he had no chance to win at any point, if he had won the government would have been even bigger than it is now and of course even way more racist classist sexist homophobic and all that other shit which is pretty sad because Bush is the worst president we have had and having someone worse would be pretty crazy!

Thank god the racist fascist homophobic sexist asshole dropped out, not that he ever had a chance...people saw right through his hollow meaningless words to what he really believes and who he really supports and hangs out with!

And this is just another example of Ron Paul's lovely supporters! As you can tell they cannot spell or use an proper grammar and of course are using wonderful racial epithets. But of course a guy who attracts so many people like this and who has said racist things himself could never be a racist especially when he says he has a black friend or wants to legalize pot.

I found this "article" a bit late, too bad I found it at all.

If Ron Paul is such a racist why did I hear him say that: "the drug laws target blacks" and Ron wants those laws repealed?

Michael Fisher slammed the very person who might have helped the black community. Nicely done!

Because those are his special words he uses to try and trick idiots like you. If you read his newsletters and actually looked at his positions and saw his followers and high ups in his ex-campaign you could easily see the real Ron Paul and his overtly racist entirety

Do you think that by posting what Paul said you're exposing something?

He is absolutely right, if you hold to the constitution, people have the right to discriminate. I don't agree with discrimination based on ethnic background or skin color but that doesn't give me the right to force my views on someone else.

In the words of Will Smith, "So you do you, and I'll do me"

Peace!

Ryan

Sorry Ryan but Ron Paul dropped out he couldn't handle being attacked by everyone especially anti fascists and anti racists (who are still busy trying to take him down the rest of the way so we don't have to deal with him again) We don't take too kindly to racists and Ron Paul is a bonafide racist and this is just one little piece on him but you should have seen Stormfront when he was still running they had thousands of pages in support of him as well as their people going to his rallies in support and donation buttons for Ron Paul!
Ron Paul is right, very very very far right.

The author asks "whos liberty?" does it infringe on. It infringes on the liberty of private citizens to do as they wish with their property. I know it seems complicated for people who do not understand the constitution, but the government telling any citizen what they can and can not do, while not causing physical harm to anyone, is tyranny, not freedom. Stop thinking so linearly and open your mind to real freedom and not in this black and white mentality. Black property owners should have every right to allow only blacks into their establishments as whites who want only whites in their establishments. While it is a disgusting and repulsive mind-set and way to treat fellow humans, it is the way of freedom and liberty. The government should have no say in such practices.

Ron Paul is right and you are wrong.

This is the most slanderous, nonsensical thing I have ever read. Luckily, there are few out there who have so hopelessly misconstrued Ron Paul's message.

Ron Paul is a libertarian; a belief that is inherently against racism or any other form of collectivism. His beliefs are and always have been about individualism and personal freedom.
Shame on you for throwing that in his face.

Ron Paul is and always has been a paleo-conservative a movement deeply intertwined with racism, with heavy heavy heavy ties to slavery and Jim Crow. They want to go back to civil war era (and before) white run society that is based in religion and right wing ideals! I know many libertarians and know for sure none of them consider Ron Paul to be one though silly labels like that don't matter why not focus on his blatant racism that you Paultards keep trying to sweep under the already mounded carpet. He said a few words to make it seem like he wasn't a racist to those who I guess don't have their full brain capacity but if you look at his past and his present, the company he keeps, and his general nature and you can clearly see the real Ron Paul.