For his last big rally he brought out the masses, about 50 losers some of which where wearing Che shirts and others had signs with the no sign and socialism in the middle (with the obligitory shaved head and white skin) Can't they at least make up their minds are you are pro communist (in which case you cannot support Ron Paul especially not with what he stands for and groups involved, AHEM John Birch Society!)
This should be pretty amusing he will have another 50 and deny that he even had a newsletter and won't even mention anything about his relationships with the nazis and skinheads and Klanspeople as he did when he came about a month ago!

As an SUV driver I am offended by this post. I drive a SUV but I wouldn't vote for a progressive moron like Ron Paul in any circumstance. It would be cool to get those groups that you spoke of together. Juvenile morons playing anarchists always provide a good laugh.

dude, that made no sense whatsoever. seriously.

Please explain what didn't make sense? It all made sense if you knew what was going on maybe. Mainly it explained that Ron Paul is an extremist right winger not a progressive and that the Freepers better watch out for their cars and motorcycles as they could get damaged!

And they wonder why so many people aren't proud to be white!

Cutting out a photographer's ID bug is pretty low, even for you.

You could at least give a photo credit, or is that beyond you?

I'm pretty sure I've seen that top pic somewhere else-- it ain't public domain and snipping it isn't fair use either.

I don't know which of several dozen "Anonymous" posters I'm engaging here, but just to make sure we're all straight, here:

If you go to the original DC IMC posting of the Nov. 10 Philly event, all the still images there are clearly bugged for either myself or Isis. In fact, the first image right after the close-crop square portrait detail of The Ron's noble mug — the one with the empty mic stand shoved into his face — is followed by the original it was cropped from, with Isis' bug on it. There's no mistaking anybody's work for anybody else's on that post.

(Jayzus, I can't believe I'm responding to a comment thread on this goddamn' site — especially a thread that's gone as far south as quickly as this one. Serves me right for giving a shit.)

why doesnt the DC IMC collective require people to have accounts to make comments. That way you can get rid of some of the assholes who come here and act like jackasses.

That way people can also stop hiding behind the anonymous posters.

Infoshop.org did it, and it was inconvenient, but it cut down the BS.

DC Indymedia is fine as it is! Part of having a free site is that you can engage "the other side" and win the battle of ideas with compelling arguments! It isn't about just having the usual groupies that agree with you post shit and pretend you have a site where ideas can be debated seriously, when in reality is just an exclusive outfit of self-righteous assholes who love to flash their fucking anarchist credentials just because is cool! Infoshop.org, give me a fucking break!

Ron Paul believes in ending the War on Drugs.

Obama and Clinton don't. Nor will they ever, because they believe that government can solve your problems.

Remember that Clinton though that the US government could solve Iraq's problems as well.

Ron Paul also supports White Nationalism and extreme right wing politics. He wants to end the war for the same reasons a group like the KKK or Nazis would want to end the war, not because he is a lefty. He wants to take away a WOMANS RIGHT to choose and make it hard for people of color to vote and have jobs and live as human beings in America. He wants to turn our large government into a much larger government (even though he B.S. about small government if you actually look into everything he wants to do it would take a huge government to do so!) Luckily Ron Paul has no chance and Clinton has little chance and at the very least Obama is a person of color so he will break the white male domination (at least skin color wise)